If you are concerned about the health or safety of a child click here.

Federal Advocacy

CLM Priority Federal Legislation

CLM tracks federal legislation and budget items that affect the well-being of children and families and the providers that serve them. Check out CLM's brief overview of Federal Priorities and key issues below.


"Baby Bonds" - Child Development Accounts

A national “baby bonds” program, introduced in the 2023 American Opportunity Accounts Act by Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), would authorize federally funded and managed savings accounts for children under the age of 18. The goal being to build a foundation for economic opportunity for all Americans, while breaking the generational cycles of poverty for underserved communities in the process, combatting the racial wealth gap.

The government would automatically deposit into managed savings accounts money for each child when they're born (annually adjusted for inflation). Funds would sit in the interest-bearing accounts and each year, a child could receive additional deposits from the government depending on family income. The investments would be excluded from asset limits for other government benefits. A child can access the funds at 18 for allowable uses such as educational expenses or buying a home.

For more information on how this bill would impact families across the country and in Massachusetts, check out our blog post.

Connecticut was the first state to establish a baby bonds program, followed by the District of Columbia and more recently
California. We urge Congress to pass a national baby bonds program informed by the lessons learned at the state and local level.

Education

Federal Department of Education Programs and Funding

The U.S. Department of Education plays an important role in ensuring the equitable education of marginalized populations, with funding to support schools in educating students living in low-income communities, children experiencing homelessness, children living in foster care, and children with disabilities. The funding associated with these programs, which are reauthorized every five years by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), are passed to schools by formula through state education agencies. States can also apply for waivers from some ESEA requirements.

Additionally, the 1982 Supreme Court ruling Plyler v. Doe established that denying undocumented children access to free public K-12 education violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. 

In Massachusetts

Massachusetts receives approximately $1.272 billion in federal education dollars across Title I, school nutrition, and special education funding.

DESE has issued recent guidance and special advisories upholding protection for targeted populations:

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Federal Special Education Entitlement Grant provides funds to ensure that eligible students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education that includes special education and related services designed to meet their individual needs in the least restrictive environment. This funding has been critical over the years in deinstitutionalizing special education and supporting students with special needs to be successful in their local school.

Federal IDEA funding by Massachusetts school district (DESE)

Additional Resources
Recent news

Executive Orders

The Trump Administration is using the Executive Order function to disrupt federal governmental activity on a wide variety of fronts. Executive Orders only apply to federal funding and policies. Many of these Executive Orders that would harm children have been paused by lawsuits filed by states and national organizations.

Resources

Tracking Executive Orders:

Litigation related to Executive Orders impacting children, families, and service providers:

Additional responses to recent Executive Orders impacting children, families, and service providers:

Federal Budget/Appropriations

April 2025

CLM watches various federal budget items related to child welfare and related issues, in partnership with our national coalitions.

See the latest Child Welfare League of America (CWLA) budget tracker here.

Annual Federal Budget

In early April the House and Senate both opened their processes for taking in FY2026 budget requests from their members.

On March 14, 2025, Congress passed a Continuing Resolution (CR) to avoid a federal government shut-down, extending funding for the federal government through September 30 with few changes to spending levels, mostly eliminating earmarks. The CR includes a $13 billion (1.7%) reduction to non-defense discretionary spending; including:

  • $40M in cuts to Children & Families Services Programs under the Administration of Children and Families
  • $144M in cuts to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
  • Increased funding for SNAP and WIC benefits

Recent news about the Continuing Resolution (Roll Call)
Bill Text

Budget reconciliation

On April 10, 2025 the House passed their version of a reconciliation budget bill. This bill includes much deeper cuts than the Senate version.

On April 5, 2025, the Senate passed their version of a reconciliation budget bill, including all of President Trump's majority priorities, including a provision to cut $880 million from the Committee that oversees Medicaid, despite proposed amendments to protect funding for essential services like Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the Social Services Block Grant, and Head Start.

In Spring 2025, the House and Senate introduced versions of budget reconciliation packages that would align with Trump Administration priorities. Budget reconciliation is a mechanism to adjust current FY funding to align with a new Administration's priorities.

See a summary of the House reconciliation budget here.

See a summary of the Senate reconciliation budget here.

CLM is deeply concerned about proposed or potential cuts to Medicaid and basic assistance programs that would directly harm children, families, and service providers.

Resources

Health and Human Services

The federal department of Health and Human Services is the home to many programs that support the well-being of children, as well as the various programs and funding streams that make up the child welfare system.

The Administration of Children and Families (ACF) is the hub for many child well-being and related programs, including the Children's Bureau, which focuses on programs that reduce child abuse and neglect, increase the number of adoptions, and strengthen foster care. Much of their role includes administering funding, grants, and technical assistance to states, and collecting data, to ensure that funds are used appropriately.

In April 2025, the Trump Administration began consolidating offices, closing regional offices, and laying off workers from HHS, threatening the continuation of program implementation and flow of funds to states and local communities for vital human services.

Included in these cuts are:

  • 500 staff from the ACF, as well as closure of five Regional Offices including Region 1 (Boston). These regional offices provide technical assistance for agencies administering ACF, including child welfare, child care, and Head Start services. Oversight of these regions is reassigned to the remaining regional offices.
  • All staff from the office that administers the Social Services Block Grant (SSBG), a flexible grant program that states use for a variety of programmatic supports for children and families. As the agency website describes: "Through the SSBG, states provide essential social services that help achieve a myriad of goals to reduce dependency and promote self-sufficiency; protect children and adults from neglect, abuse, and exploitation..."
    • The elimination of SSBG is included in the House Budget Committee’s list of spending reforms for reconciliation, as well; this move by the Administration further jeopardizes the future of this important program that provides $910 million for child welfare services.
  • Other cuts to HHS/ACF include:
    • Office of Regional Operations eliminated.
    • Office of Family Assistance- Division of State Policy, Budget Team both eliminated, which manages TANF.
    • Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) team mostly eliminated
    • Children’s Bureau- Division of State Systems eliminated
    • Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB) - Policy Team eliminated
    • Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE): expect a 50% cut to its contract budget overall; OPRE holds the contract for managing the Prevention Services Clearinghouse launched by the Family First Prevention Services Act.
    • Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Bureau of Maternal and Child Health (includes the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program)

HHS also announced in February that it was rescinding agency policy of public commenting on most rulemaking. We are deeply concerned about the effect of cutting off public insight and data to the rulemaking process at HHS.

Take Action

CLM is encouraging members to sign on to this letter to urge Congressional leadership to protect the Social Services Block Grant.

Recent News and Resources

Immigration

CLM is committed to upholding services for children living in the Commonwealth, regardless of immigration status. Targeting immigrants without a criminal charge has a chilling effect on children and their families accessing resources that support healthy child development, attending school, accessing health care, and obtaining employment. We urge families to know their rights when it comes to immigration enforcement.

Resources for families
Resources for providers
Related issues and information

Medicaid

April 2025

Monitoring Medicaid

CLM monitors priorities and concerns for children and families, including in light of the next federal Administration's potential funding and policy changes. While impending changes to Medicaid are uncertain, Congressional Republicans have proposed a budget resolution that would include Medicaid cuts as part of the Administration's emphasis on improving program efficiency and program integrity, and eliminating "waste, fraud, and abuse." These cuts could result in:

  • eliminating or severely underfunding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion coverage for low-income adults;
  • weakening long-standing program protections for enrollees;
  • making it harder for states to draw down federal support, like effectively eliminating states ability to tax providers; and/or
  • restructuring and cutting general federal funding for the program, such as:
    • adding work requirements for adults receiving Medicaid benefits;
    • reducing the federal matching rate; and/or
    • capping federal spending.

In Massachusetts, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) are combined into one program called MassHealth. MassHealth members may be able to get doctors visits, prescription drugs, hospital stays, and many other important services. Behavioral health services are more impacted by Medicaid cuts than other children and family services in the Commonwealth.

Learn more about how Massachusetts uses Medicaid funding here.


Medicaid's Significance

Overview
Medicaid is a public insurance program that provides health coverage to low-income families and individuals, including children, parents, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities. 32.97 million children, and 88.4 million people overall, were enrolled in Medicaid as of Sept. 2023. (HHS Source).

See Medicaid/CHIP enrollment percentages by Congressional district here.

Benefits
There are many benefits of Medicaid, such as that it:

  • provides health insurance coverage to the most vulnerable people and improves access to care.
  • supports financial stability among low-income families;
  • improves health outcomes;
  • reduced evictions; and 
  • provides additional long-term improved outcomes for children, because children with Medicaid:
    • experience fewer emergency room visits and hospitalizations,
    • do better in school and miss fewer school days due to illness or injury,
    • are more likely to finish high school, attend college, and graduate from college., and
    • earn more money as adults.

Eligibility
In order to receive federal funding, states must cover certain “mandatory” populations, including:

  • children through age 18 in families with income below 138 percent of the federal poverty line ($29,974 for a family of three in 2020);
  • people who are pregnant and have income below 138 percent of the poverty line;
  • certain parents or caretakers with very low income; and
  • most seniors and people with disabilities who receive cash assistance through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.

Covered Services
Covered services include hospital care (both inpatient and outpatient), physicians’ services, nursing home care, home health care, and certain additional services for children. States have the authority to cover other services and populations and have used that authority extensively. Moreover, many states seek and receive waivers of federal statutory limitations that allow them to provide benefits and cover groups that would otherwise be excluded.

Cost
Medicaid is funded jointly by the federal government and the states with the federal government covering about 65 percent of the total, depending on the year. For 2023, the Federal Government will spend an estimated $607 billion on Medicaid, which is the 65% of the total estimated spending ($934 billion). Benefits for children account for only $70 billion (15.8%).

Comparison to Medicare
Medicaid is sometimes confused with Medicare, the federally administered, federally funded health insurance program for people over 65 and some people with disabilities. There is some overlap with nearly 10 million low-income seniors and people with disabilities, known as “dual eligibles”, enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid.

Resources

Title IV-B of the Social Security Act (Child and Family Services)

Title-IV B of the Social Security Act

In December 2024, the U.S. Senate passed the Supporting America’s Children and Families Act (HR 9076), preventing the expiration of Title IV-B of the Social Security Act and updating the program for the first time since 2008 by incorporating improvements. The House passed the bill in September. This bill reauthorizes Title IV-B of the Social Security Act for five years, boosts annual funding for the program, and initiates several policy shifts to modernize the program.

CLM, along with approx. 270 other organizations, advocated for the passage of this comprehensive bill. We thank Congress for reauthorizing Title IV-B of the Social Security Act with key improvements to enhance the wellbeing of children and families.

The legislation folded together 16 different legislative efforts, which are highlighted comprehensively as follows:

  • Family Preservation & Poverty Prevention
    • Increases funding for the Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program by $75M per year beginning in 2026.
    • Permits IV-B funds to be spent on concrete support such as housing, transportation or nutrition assistance.
    • Clarifies in federal law that poverty is not neglect, by underscoring the role of family preservation services for families experiencing a crisis related to a lack of resources and ensuring children are not separated from parents solely due to poverty-related neglect. 
    • Expands by $10M per year the Regional Partnership Grants to address the intersection of parental substance use and child welfare involvement.  
    • Expands by $10M per year the Court Improvement Program for state and tribal courts to manage nearly 600,000 children’s cases in court each year.  
    • Provides $5M for evaluation of services approved by the Family First Prevention Services Clearinghouse.
  • Lived Experience
    • Adds caregivers and individuals with experience in the child welfare system into who states must consult with during periodic child welfare plan updating.
    • Adds peer-to-peer mentoring led by lived experience experts to the list of accepted family preservation services.
  • Kinship
    • Strengthens support systems for the 2.5 million grandparents and relatives providing kinship care for children who would otherwise enter foster care.
  • Workforce
    • Reduces administrative burdens by requiring HHS reduce paperwork and data reporting for state agencies and caseworkers by at least 15%.
    • Ensures caseworkers have access to training and support to improve retention and recruitment.
  • Transition Age Youth
    • Improve outcomes for youth transitioning from foster care by including individuals with lived experience (formerly in foster care) in state service planning and ensuring youth have access to mental health services.
  • Post-Adoption
    • Support post-adoption services by requiring HHS to review post-adoption supports provided under Title IV-B and identify opportunities for strengthening them.
  • Residential Care
    • Adds a residential care provision requiring that the Department of Health and Human Services develop: (1) guidance around how states should collect data on well-being and alleged maltreatment in residential care and (2) best practices on improving oversight of such programs. (This compliments the Stop Institutional Child Abuse Act championed by celebrity Paris Hilton).
  • Tribal Support
    • Allocates more IV-B funding for tribes, reduces barriers to tribal participation in IV-B, and supports oversight of implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act.  
Significance of Title IV-B

Title IV-B of the Social Security Act is a critical child welfare law comprised of substantial formula federal grants supporting states' child welfare systems. These grants provide flexible funding for states to invest in maltreatment prevention, child protection, family preservation, child welfare workforce training, reunification services, and support for kinship, foster, and adoptive caregivers.

Title IV-B is made up of two programs: the Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services program and the MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families program. The funds from both parts can be used in a similar fashion, and most years total up to between $500 million and $600 million. 

Subpart 1 - Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program: promote State flexibility in the development and expansion of a coordinated child and family services program that utilizes community-based agencies and ensures all children are raised in safe, loving families to do the following:
- protect/promote the welfare of all children,
- prevent neglect, abuse, or exploitation, support at-risk families, such as through services which allow children, where
appropriate, to remain safely with their families or return to their families in a timely manner, |
- promote the safety, permanence, and well-being of children in foster care and adoptive families; and
- provide training, professional development and support to ensure a well-qualified child welfare workforce.

Subpart 2 - MaryLee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program: establish, expand, and operate coordinated programs of community-based family support services, family preservation services, family reunification services, and adoption promotion and support services to prevent child maltreatment, assure children’s safety, preserve intact families when possible, address problems so that reunification can occur in a safe an stable manner (in accordance with the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997), and provide support services to adoptive families.

Unaccompanied Refugee Minors

Note: the Trump Administration officially refers to this group as "Unaccompanied Alien Children" (UAC).

Under the UAC program, the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement promptly places UAC in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interests of the child, taking into consideration danger to self, danger to the community, and risk of flight. ORR looks at each child’s unique situation and incorporates child welfare principles when making placement, clinical, case management, and release decisions that are in the best interest of the child. The age of these individuals, their separation from parents and relatives, and the hazardous journey they take make UAC especially vulnerable to human trafficking, exploitation, and abuse.

The Massachusetts Office for Refugees and Immigrants (ORI) partners with the Department of Children and Families (DCF) to jointly administer the Commonwealth's Unaccompanied Refugee Minors Program. (URMP). This program establishes legal responsibility under State law, to ensure that eligible unaccompanied youth receive the full range of assistance, care, and services which are available to all foster children in the State in a variety of settings: in foster homes, group home settings, or in other residential settings as appropriate for each individual child. State-contracted provider facilities are state licensed and must meet ORR requirements to ensure a high level of quality of care.

  • Nationally, there are approximately 26,000 unaccompanied refugee minors with legal representation, and another 100,000 receiving legal assistance of some kind
  • In Massachusetts, over 2,000 youth receive some kind of service, and several hundred have legal representation.

Between January - March 2025, the Trump Administration froze and then cancelled the contract that funds the legal services program for UAC, effectively ended all federal funding for this program and cutting off children from legal services to support their application for refugee status and other pathways to legal residence in the United States. Effectively, this funding means the ending of foster care and other related services for unaccompanied minors. In Massachusetts, several hundred unaccompanied minors have lost their lawyers, with the more than 2,000 children who receive services short of full representation also facing the loss of assistance.

The national program Kids In Need of Defense (KIND) is organizing advocacy to restore legal protection and other services for unaccompanied refugee minors. Learn more and take action here. A lawsuit was also filed to restore these services (see below).

Recent news and updates

John Lewis Every Child Deserves a Family Act

This a prior session bill that has not yet been reintroduced in the current Congress.

The John Lewis Every Child Deserves a Family Act (ECDFA) would prohibit any child welfare agency receiving federal financial assistance from discriminating against any potential foster or adoptive family on the basis of religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status. In addition, ECDFA would prevent discrimination against any foster youth because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Read more about the aims of this legislation

The Chafee Program & Other Supports for Transition-Age Youth

Congress needs to ensure that young people in foster care have access to adequate support and services as they transition to adulthood and independence.

Congress must:
- Increase funding for the John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood and fully fund Education and Training Vouchers.

The Chafee Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood provides funds to states to assist them in offering supportive
services for youth who experience foster care at age 14 or older, including former foster youth up to a certain age. The program
seeks to address poor education, employment, and other outcomes experienced by many such foster youth as they transition to
adulthood. This includes the Educational and Training Vouchers Program (ETV) for Youth Aging out of Foster Care.

- Extend foster care to at least age 21 nationally
- Provide greater and simpler access to student loans and on-campus services
- Support youth who experience foster care in obtaining driver’s licenses
- Increase state-level access to the federal Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) vouchers and provide greater targeted housing assistance

Family First Prevention Services Act

The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) was signed into law in 2018, expanding entitlement funding, focused on preventing children and their families from becoming involved in the child welfare system by providing evidence-based services to children who are considered “candidates for foster care." It amended Title IV-E (Foster Care) and Title IV-B of the Social Security Act (Child and Family Services) to child welfare programs and policy. Highlights include as follows:

  • Prevent children from entering foster care through new optional prevention services and programs
  • Restrict placement options for children being placed in care to mainly family foster homes with limited use of congregate care settings
  • Improve the electronic interstate processing system
  • Establish model licensing standards for family foster homes
  • Supports recruitment and retention of high-quality foster families
  • Extend John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence Programs to age 23
  • Reauthorization of the Adoption Incentives program
  • Provides 50% match funding for kinship navigator programs
  • Allows room and board payments for children in care placed with their parent in family-based substance use residential treatment

See the latest from the Prevention Services Clearinghouse here.

Massachusetts mostly uses Family First to fund programming through Family Support and Stabilization, where applicable.

Child Tax Credit

The Expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC), passed as part of the American Rescue Plan Act to provide relief for families during the COVID-19 pandemic, has been hailed as the most successful anti-child poverty policy option available. The credit expansion lifted more than 3.5 million children out of poverty and research shows that most families spent their monthly CTC payments on necessities such as food, clothing, and housing. The expansion of the CTC had no negative effect on employment.

Congress must:
- Expand the Child Tax Credit by:

  • making it fully refundable
  • reinstating monthly payments
  • increasing the total value for families, particularly those with low income

The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA)

The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) provides funding to states for state child protective services, including investigation, protection and any treatment services. It requires states to meet certain provisions such as mandated reporting. Title II of CAPTA is referred to as the Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention program, or CB-CAP. It supports community-based efforts to develop, operate, expand, and coordinate programs and activities to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Congress must:
- Reauthorize CAPTA with a higher authorized funding level and with additional attention to child fatalities, children born exposed
to substances, and enhanced legal representation for children and families
- Reject all efforts to narrow and politicize the broad federal definition of child maltreatment
- Reauthorize the Adoption Opportunities Act with greater research on adoption disruption and dissolution and more support for
post-adoption services

Qualified residential treatment programs (QRTPs)  Exemption from Institutions for Mental Disease (IMD) Exclusion

The Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018 (FFPSA) created a federal category of residential settings called qualified residential treatment programs (QRTPs) that provide short-term care for children in foster care with assessed emotional or behavioral needs in a residential setting. The health care needs of children in foster care are covered by Medicaid. Today, however, QRTPs may not receive Medicaid financing because of the Institutions for Mental Disease (IMD) exclusion, a law that prohibits Medicaid payments to an institution with more than 16 beds that primarily provides care for people with mental health conditions.

The Ensuring Medicaid Continuity for Children in Foster Care Act of 2023 (H.R.4056) would provide a narrow exemption from the IMD exclusion to ensure children in foster care receiving care in QRTPs can continue to receive care provided in these settings without losing their federal Medicaid coverage. The bill would lift the Exclusion in a manner consistent with guardrails from the Families First Prevention Services Act, which include screenings to place children appropriately in and out of care and requirements to discharge children from facilities expeditiously so that they can return to their families as quickly as possible.

Numerous local, state, and national organizations have joined in advocating for this reform to ensure Congress understands the issue and the need to support access to trauma-responsive, youth-driven, family-focused QRTPs nationwide (see IMD Federal Policy Brief from the National Association of Medicaid Directors). Please join us in asking Congress to ensure services for children in QRTPs are fully funded by Medicaid.

2025© All Rights Reserved. The Children's League of Massachusetts
Privacy Policy
envelopephone-handsetmap-marker